When purchasing a 3D printer, it is vital to consider the difference between open-source and closed-source platforms. A closed-source platform refers to a 3D printer that does not provide flexibility in terms of material brand. These production systems are centered around a sole manufacturer, which means that they are only compatible with one specific brand of material. Users who do not wish to expand beyond a limited scope of materials might prefer a closed-source platform, but generally speaking, members of the additive manufacturing community find closed-source platforms quite limiting.
Though users tend to prefer open-source platforms, manufacturers typically prefer contriving production systems that are closed-source so that they can maximize their material sales. Over time, users have found this restrictive and costly, and there is a growing industry preference towards systems that are open-source.
Open-source 3D printers allow users to print with materials from any provider, which is advantageous for those who want to experiment with different materials, along with those who are simply able to find cheaper material alternatives. Fundamentally, these systems are more attractive to users because their production process does not have to become dominated by a sole brand. Open-source platforms also provide users with a larger community of those contributing to shared files, advice, and tips. Because of this, open-source systems typically lead to quicker industry developments simply because of a higher collective collaboration rate.
When it comes down to selecting a new printer, buyers should have a full understanding of these different models for production systems. Without understanding the true loss in flexibility, users might trap themselves into selecting a closed-source system based upon its standardization and simplicity alone.
